Pages

Nissan Leaf – less than 4 hours

The 2013 models now have a 6.6-kw on-board charger either standard or optionally, and accept a maximum 30 amps.
IMG_9866

Previously the 3.6-kw charger was a bottleneck making recharge times for the 24-kwh battery closer to 7 hours. Preferred EVSE supplier is AeroVironment.
House current takes around 20 hours and a DC Quick Charge via a CHAdeMO port allows for 80-percent charge in an estimated 30 minutes or less.

Fiat 500E – less than 4 hours

Fiat_EV_FT013

Tied with Nissan’s time for level 2, the Fiat 500E also has a 24-kwh battery and 6.6-kw on-board charger.
Estimated charge time for level 1 is longer at 24 hours. Level 3 charging is not available.
AeroVironment is the preferred EVSE supplier.

85-kwh Tesla Model S – 4.27 hours

This one takes more asterisks than usual. Tesla likes to hedge answers, and indeed a lot of variables come into play.
model-s-red-palosverde_1The theoretically quickest time assuming Tesla’s “62 miles per hour” recharge rate with Tesla’s HPWC for its 265 miles EPA-rated range should be 4.27 hours with twin on-board chargers.

If Tesla’s “300” miles range often quoted is indicated on its range readout – and as mentioned, depending on your real-world recharge rate – time could be longer.
“A Supercharger can charge about half the battery in 20 minutes,” says Tesla.
If equipped with only one 10-kw on-board charger, max amperage is cut in half to 40 amps, and charge times go up commensurately.
The Model S touch screen for fully equipped models allows charging input from 5 amps to 80 amps (in single amp increment/decrement settings) with all home or public charge options.
If you wish to use only house current, recharging at 12 amps at 120 volts could take up to 52 hours, 24 minutes.
For a fuller idea of variables, we suggest perusing Tesla’s Web page.
 see here onwards: RAV4 EV – 6 hours

Smart ForTwo ED – 6 hours

The Daimler-made Smart ForTwo ED comes with a smallish 17.6-kwh battery and takes around 6 hours with a lower-capacity on-board charger.
House current recharging is estimated at around 14 hours, and charging from 20 percent to 80-percent takes around 10 hours.
Bosche is the preferred EVSE supplier.

Chevrolet Spark EV – 7 hours


2014-Chevrolet-SparkEV-058-mediumGM only gave its 21-kwh battery a 3.3-kw onboard charger, so its level 2 EVSE from preferred supplier Bosche delivering 30 amps takes longer, and charging on house current does too, at 20 hours.
The upside is a SAE combo DC fast charger promises to charge the battery to 80 percent in just 20 minutes.

Mitsubishi i-MiEV – 7 hours


The i-MiEV’s 16-kwh battery takes around 7 hours to recharge at level 2.
i-MiEVMitsubishi is bold enough not only to offer the car in 50 states, it also confesses level 1 recharge time is 22.5 hours with the supplied cord.
The car also accepts DC quick charging via a CHAdeMO port that can replenish 80-percent charge in 30 minutes.

Relevance?

For those who want to travel the farthest in a day, quicker options can mean less “range anxiety.”
For example, a Nissan Leaf zapped back mid-day with a quick charger, may travel 150 miles or more, if the owner is resourceful, or fortunate enough to have charging options.
see here onwards:

EV Recharge Times

This list for U.S. market cars assumes the battery is fully drawn down to the point that its battery management system (BMS) has stopped the car.
All these EVs can be plugged into ordinary wall current, and some drivers may be fine with that. Recharge times listed however are for the quickest level 2 recharge either estimated or as stated (often in ballpark terms) by the manufacturer.
For cars that specify a “preferred EVSE supplier” in most cases (except Tesla) it’s not required you go with only this supplier.

Honda Fit EV – under 3 hours


2013_Honda_Fit_EV1Its smaller 20-kwh battery recharges quickly with a fast 6.6-kw on-board charger at 32 amps.
House current recharge time is estimated at 15 hours. Level 3 is not now available.
Leviton is the preferred EVSE manufacturer.

60-kwh Tesla Model S – 3.35 hours

Going with Tesla’s “62 miles of range per hour” quoted recharge rate with its HPWC, the 208 miles EPA-rated range of the 60-kwh car should be replenished in 3.35 hours. This assumes the twin on-board chargers rated at 20 kw.

With only the single standard 10-kw onboard charger, or an EVSE rated at lower amps, times increase. Tesla quotes 31 miles of range per hour with level 2 and using its included Mobile Connector.
Tesla_Model_S_SunsetIf Supercharger compatible, 150 miles of charge range can take under 20 minutes.
Preferred EVSE supplier for its proprietary charge port is – you guessed it – Tesla. For more details, check out Tesla’s interactive Web page.
Ford-Focus-Electric-Feature-1213

Ford Focus Electric – 3.6 hours


The Ford Focus Electric’s 6.6-kw onboard charger and 30 amps makes for a rapid recharge to its 23-kwh battery.
Level 1 recharge time is estimated at 18 hours, and the car does not accept level 3.
Ford’s preferred EVSE supplier is AeroVironment

.see here onwards :Nissan Leaf – less than 4 hours

Toyota Rav4 Recall, Lexus HS250h Recall, Tire Rod Failure Danger

Toyota RAV4 Recalled for Crash Danger
Report Receipt Date: AUG 28, 2013 
NHTSA Campaign Number: 13V383000 
Component(s): SUSPENSION 
Potential Number of Units Affected: 780,584 




SUMMARY:
Toyota is recalling certain model year 2006 through 2011 RAV4 and 2010 Lexus HS250h passenger vehicles manufactured from October 2005 through September 2010. If the nuts for adjusting the rear wheel alignment are improperly tightened during service, the rear suspension arm (rear tire rod) may develop unwanted movement and rust leading to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the rear tire rod will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.
CONSEQUENCE:
Failure of the rear tie rod could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.


Got a lemon Lexus or a lemon Toyota Rav4?
Want a new Lexus or a new Toyota or your money back?
Get Justice



Mazda recalls the 2009-2013 Mazda 6 vehicles for a door latch they may come loose.

SUMMARY:
Mazda is recalling certain model year 2009-2013 Mazda6 vehicles manufactured February 4, 2008, through August 24, 2012. The door latch mounting screws may become loose.
CONSEQUENCE:
If all three door latch mounting screws become excessively loose the door latch mechanism would not engage and the door might open while the vehicle is in motion increasing the risk of accident or injury.


Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2005 Sienna vehicles due to a problem within the shift lock solenoid.

SUMMARY:
Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2005 Sienna vehicles manufactured January 10, 2003, through August 10, 2005; and model year 2007-2009 Sienna vehicles manufactured February 20, 2007, through December 12, 2008. In the affected vehicles, due to a problem within the shift lock solenoid, there is a possibility that the shift lever could be moved out of Park position without depressing the brake pedal.
CONSEQUENCE:
If the shift lever is moved out of the Park position without the brake applied, the transmission will either engage a drive gear or Neutral, increasing the risk of a backover or roll away crash.

2007 Toyota Sienna

Nissan Is recalling 2006-2010 Infiniti M35 and M45 vehicle for the Accelerator Pedal Sensor Signal and Possible Stalling.

SUMMARY:
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2006-2010 Infiniti M35 and M45 vehicles manufactured April 4, 2004, through October 5, 2010. Over time, the accelerator pedal sensor signal may deteriorate resulting in the output of an incorrect signal causing the engine to go into fail-safe (limp home) mode.
CONSEQUENCE:
In this fail-safe mode, throttle valve deposits may cause the engine to stall when the vehicle is coming to a stop or at idle, increasing the risk of a crash.


Jeep Grand Cherokee Recall, Dodge Ram 1500 Recall, Dodge Ram 2500 Recall, Dodge Ram 3500 Recall, Computer Software Glitch

Jeep Grand Cherokee recalled for computer software glitch
Chrysler is recalling almost 11,000 Dodge Ram pickup trucks and 132,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles because it has discovered a computer glitch.

Software controls the warning system lights and the instrument cluster in the vehicles. Flashing warning lights and failing instrument clusters have been reported and the subsequent investigation triggered the massive recall.

Recall details were reported in Automotive News and are online at this link, click here.

Got a lemon Dodge Ram or Jeep Grand Cherokee?
Want a new Dodge truck  or a new Jeep Grand Cherokee?
Or your money back?
Get Justice

BMW is recalling certain model 2008 through 2010 vehicles for defects with tail lamps.

SUMMARY:
BMW is recalling certain model year 2008 through 2010 528i, 535i, 550i, and M5 passenger cars manufactured from March 1, 2007, through December 31, 2009. Over time, increased resistance at the taillight electrical contact points may cause damage to the ground terminal and housing of the connector resulting in an intermittent or permanent loss of functionality of one or more rear lamp functions (tail, brake, turn-signal, reverse).
CONSEQUENCE:
Intermittent light operation reduces the ability to warn other motorists of the driver's intentions, increasing the risk of a crash.

BMW 528i Recall, BMW 535i Recall, BMW 550i Recall, BMW M5 Recall, Rear Lighting Failure Danger

Report Receipt Date: SEP 11, 2013 
NHTSA Campaign Number: 13V407000 
Component(s): EXTERIOR LIGHTING 
Potential Number of Units Affected: 134,100

SUMMARY:
BMW is recalling certain model year 2008 through 2010 528i, 535i, 550i, and M5 passenger cars manufactured from March 1, 2007, through December 31, 2009. Over time, increased resistance at the taillight electrical contact points may cause damage to the ground terminal and housing of the connector resulting in an intermittent or permanent loss of functionality of one or more rear lamp functions (tail, brake, turn-signal, reverse).
CONSEQUENCE:
Intermittent light operation reduces the ability to warn other motorists of the driver's intentions, increasing the risk of a crash.


Got a lemon BMW car?
Want a new BMW or your money back?
Get Justice

A 240-volt EVSE

A 240-volt EVSE is something most EV owners choose to install. If you want to plug into 120-volt “house” current with the included cord, plan on it taking around a day and a night or longer to recharge a depleted battery.
EVSE units are basically a fancy switch with safety built in to prevent unfortunate things like you electrocuting yourself, or taking or delivering more power than would be copacetic.
They plug with a special multi-pin connector into the car – usually an SAE J1772, but Tesla (like Apple) which likes to zig when everyone else zags – has gone its own route with a proprietary plug and port, but offers adapters.

The EVSEs sold today vary in their maximum amperage and kilowatt output and thus can serve as another effective bottleneck.
bosche_evse
Manufacturers typically quote level 2 recharge times based on the assumption that you are using the most potent 240-volt EVSE possible, often 30 amps with kilowatts varying.
If an EV can take more amps or kilowatts, that means it can replenish more “miles of range per hour” as Tesla puts it.
These details are not always spelled out in graphic detail by EV sellers, but the good news is it is not advanced astrophysics. When we asked every EV maker in America today to answer the same list of questions, we got varying degrees of transparency. Some did not know all the answers, some failed to even get back to us, and Fiat (Chrysler) took the cake as being the most crystal clear in its answers to the spirit of what we were asking.
“Amperes are everything when it comes to recharging. Charge time is directly proportional to amps,” replied Chrysler media rep Jiyan Cadiz. “A simple example would be, if you install the AeroVironment Level 2 EVSE (30 amp service) offered through Mopar on a 20 amp circuit, the charge time would be 1/3 slower (or 20 amps/30 amps = 2/3 max energy draw into the car).”
i–MiEV_EVSE

And we’ll add, if you buy a 15 or 25 amp EVSE and plug in a car set up for 30 amps or more, you have again effectively handicapped your recharge time.
On the other hand if your car can only accept 30 amps, and you plug in a 40-amp EVSE, software will limit the input, and it will charge no faster than at 30 amps.
We could go on and on adding qualifiers to this, but the simple answer is if you want fastest recharge times, the correct thing to do is to ask the automaker or a charging equipment supplier what’s the fastest way to go.
Among EVSEs, Tesla offers the most potent – its High Power Wall Connector (HPWC) – with up to 80 amps deliverable to cars with “twin chargers.”

This, by the way, is the answer to how Tesla at “level 2” can charge a Model S quicker than a Mitsubishi i-MiEV. The Tesla also costs around four times more, so go figure.
high-power-wall-connector
Tesla advertises that 62 miles range per hour gets added back to a Model S using its HPWC under ideal conditions of voltage, amperage and wire gauge size at minimal length. We know of one Model S Signature Performance owner who uses all 80 amps of his HPWC plugged into a dedicated 100-amp circuit, and gets only 54 miles per hour range.

Quicker Options

Beyond home charging, a few cars accept what’s called “level 3” or “DC Quick” charging. These expensive-to-install public EVSE deliver around 480 volts and a whole lot of amps. Tesla also has its public free “superchargers.”

Final Note


NEMA_14-50_plug
If you plan to install a charger at home – for any brand EV – you will want to ensure the amperage of the line is up to the needs of the charging equipment, and ideally, use a “dedicated circuit.”
In other words, do not also run an air conditioner or clothes dryer on the same circuit, or this will limit the power to your car, and may even overload the circuit if it is not set up for this much draw.


 see here :EV Recharge Times

Which Electric Cars Charge The Fastest

When you ask a simple question, you normally expect a simple answer, right?
The problem with asking “which EVs charge the fastest” is while some may think it’s a simple inquiry, it really isn’t. In fact, if we had to put asterisks on the highly qualified answers for the 10 electric cars sold in America, we’d need asterisks for the asterisks.
But for those of you who grew up accustomed to quicker gratification – from such experiences as drive-in restaurants, and, well, quick-filling gas stations for example – the list is under “EV Recharge Times” below.
If you want an easy answer, go ahead and skip over the following qualifier sections if you dare.

Asterisks And More Asterisks

Are you still here? Cool. We’ll try to keep this simple and more interesting than the fine print for a credit card app, or what have you.
Rule number one is, assuming an “empty” battery, EV charge times depend on the kilowatt-hours (kwh) of the battery being charged, and how fast it will accept juice.
For example, the Mitsubishi i-MiEV has the smallest (16-kwh) battery and the Tesla Model S comes with the largest 60-kwh or 85-kwh battery.
All conditions being equal, a larger battery takes more energy, and this should mean a longer recharge time.

Mitsu-i-MiEV_ArchBut we warned you answers need qualification. Believe it or not, in this case Tesla has figured a way for people at home to cram electricity back into its 4-5 times larger packs much faster than the i-MiEV, but we’ll explain this later.
Nissan Leaf with aftermarket charger installed.Another factor to be mindful of is the electric current delivered by the charger. Actually, the “charger” is not the device with a cord you plug into the car. The “charger” is the on-board charger built into the car – often 3.3 kw, or 6.6, kw, and in the case of Tesla, 10 kw or a pair equaling 20 kw.
The rate at which the car’s on-board charger passes juice to the battery pack makes for an effective bottleneck. As a loose analogy, with a garden hose you can’t very easily water your lawn faster than the hose will allow, can you? So it is with the charger. It delivers electricity at a certain maximum rate, and that’s it.
Nissan Leaf with aftermarket charger installed.
(Of course if someone retrofitted a faster on-board charger, aside from voiding the warranty and other possible problems, he or she might charge the car quicker, but we’ll leave this discussion at that).
And if these aren’t enough qualifiers for you, consider also the “EVSE” (Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment). Often mislabeled the “charger,” these matter as do the amount of volts and amps of the circuit it’s plugged into.
To sort of level the playing field, our list below focuses on official manufacturer ratings for 240 volt – AKA “level 2″ or “220” volt – power fed through a “charger” (actually the blandly titled EVSE.)
 See next :evse

Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. (Suzuki) is recalling certain model year Grand Vitara vehicle for an airbag defect.

SUMMARY:
Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. (Suzuki) is recalling certain model year 2006-2011 Grand Vitara and 2007-2011 SX4 vehicles. In the affected vehicles, over time, the OCS sensor mat installed in the front passenger seat may fail due to repeated flexing of the mat from use of the seat. As a result, during a crash necessitating deployment, the air bag will deploy regardless of whether the front seat occupant is an adult or a child.
CONSEQUENCE:
Air bag deployment with a child in the front passenger side seat increases the risk of injury to that child.



Got a lemon Suzuki Grand Vitara?
Want a new Suzuki or your money back?
Get Justice




Lexus GS350 Recall, Lexus IS350 Recall, Engine Stopping Danger

Report Receipt Date: SEP 04, 2013 
NHTSA Campaign Number: 13V395000 
Component(s): ENGINE 
Potential Number of Units Affected: 101,584 

SUMMARY:
Toyota is recalling certain model year 2007-2011 Lexus GS350 vehicles manufactured June 19, 2006, through July 12, 2011; and model year 2006-2011 Lexus IS350 vehicles manufactured May 27, 2005, through July 13, 2011; and model year 2010-2011 Lexus IS350c vehicles manufactured November 25, 2009, through July 19, 2011. These vehicles, equipped with the 2GR-FSE engine, use bolts to secure the housing and sprocket of the Variable-Valve Timing (VVT) system gear assembly. These bolts could become loose due to abnormal impacts generated within the gear assembly immediately after a cold start-up.
CONSEQUENCE:
The loose bolts could cause the VVT gear housing and sprocket to separate and result in the engine stopping while the vehicle is being driven, increasing the risk of a crash


Got a lemon Lexus GS350 or a lemon Lexus IS350?
Want a new Lexus or your money back?
Get Justice



Honda Pilot Recall, Honda Odyssey Recall, Piston Failure Risk

Honda Pilot Recalled for Piston Failure Danger
Report Receipt Date: AUG 27, 2013 
NHTSA Campaign Number: 13V382000 
Component(s): ENGINE 
Potential Number of Units Affected: 270

SUMMARY:
Honda is recalling certain model year 2013 Pilot 2WD and 4WD vehicles and certain model year 2013 Odyssey vehicles. During manufacturing of the engine piston, it is possible that the heat treatment process was not properly applied, resulting in the piston having an insufficient hardness level, making it more susceptible to premature wear.
CONSEQUENCE:
A worn piston may suddenly fail, causing the engine to stall, increasing the risk of a crash.


Got a lemon Honda Pilot or Honda Odyssey?
Want a new Honda or your money back?
Get Justice



Ford F-350 Recall, Ford F-450 Recall, Ford F-550 Recall, Fire Danger

Ford Truck Recall by Manning Equipment for Fire Risk
Report Receipt Date: AUG 23, 2013 
NHTSA Campaign Number: 13V380000 
Component(s): ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING 
Potential Number of Units Affected: 37 


SUMMARY:
Manning Equipment Inc. LLC (Manning) is recalling certain model year 2012 Ford F-350, F-450 and F-550 gasoline engined dual rear wheel chassis vehicles manufactured October 2011 through June 2012. The tailpipe on the exhaust system does not extend out beyond the edge of the body, allowing heat to build up in rear curbside storage compartment.
CONSEQUENCE:
Excessive heat build up in rear compartment could result in fire.

Got a lemon Ford pickup truck?
Want a new Ford truck or your money back?
Get Justice



Volvo recalls several vehicle models for defects with the keyless ignition











Manufacturer: Volvo Cars of N.A., LLC
SUMMARY:
Volvo is recalling certain model year 2014 S60, S80, XC60 and XC70 vehicles equipped with keyless ignition. In the affected vehicles, the Central Electronic Module (CEM) will not perform as intended. As a result, the front windshield wipers might run continuously when the ignition is on. Also, the turn signals, high beams, and headlight switch might not work.
CONSEQUENCE:
Malfunctioning head lamps and/or turn signals increase 
the risk of a crash.






Got a lemon Volvo?
Want a new Chevrolet Volvo or your money back?
Get Justice

Honda recalls the 2013 Pilot and 2013 Odyssey vehicles for possible premature wear on the pistons.

NHTSA Campaign Number: 13V382000 
SUMMARY:
Honda is recalling certain model year 2013 Pilot 2WD and 4WD vehicles and certain model year 2013 Odyssey vehicles. During manufacturing of the engine piston, it is possible that the heat treatment process was not properly applied, resulting in the piston having an insufficient hardness level, making it more susceptible to premature wear.
CONSEQUENCE:
A worn piston may suddenly fail, causing the engine to stall, increasing the risk of a crash.


Got a lemon Honda Pilot or Honda Odyssey?
Want a new Ford or new Lincoln?
Get Justice

Bombardier Recreational Products Recalls the Can-AM Spyder for a brake fluid leak.

Do you own a 2013 Can-AM Spyder Motorcycles that you think is a lemon?

  • 2013 Can-AM Spyder RT
  • 2013 Can-AM Spyder ST
SUMMARY:
Bombardier Recreational Products (BRP) is recalling certain model year 2013 Can-Am Spyder RT series and ST series motorcycles. The tandem brake master cylinder manifold inlet may melt allowing the brake fluid to leak out.
CONSEQUENCE:
Brake fluid may leak onto a heat source, increasing the risk of a fire.

If you live in Ohio or Kentucky, we've got the answer so just call us and we'll explain it for you. We can tell you how you can use the lemon law to get rid of your unusable and dangerous lemon 2013 Can-AM Spyder Motorcycles or any other potential Lemon Can-Am Call us (toll free Ph: 888.331.6422) 

Ford Crown Victoria Recall, Mercury Grand Marquis Recall, Lincoln Town Car Recall, Steering failure danger

Northern US Ford Crown Vic Recall, Steering Failure Risk
Report Receipt Date: AUG 29, 2013 
NHTSA Campaign Number: 13V385000 
Component(s): STEERING 
Potential Number of Units Affected: 355,000

SUMMARY:
Ford is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria (including Crown Victoria Police Interceptors), Mercury Grand Marquis, and Lincoln Town Car vehicles. The affected vehicles are currently registered or were originally sold in Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Severe corrosion can seize the lower intermediate shaft which may cause the upper intermediate shaft to collapse and the steering column lower bearing to separate.
CONSEQUENCE:
If the lower bearing separates, the vehicle may experience a loss of steering, increasing the risk of a crash.


Got a lemon Ford Crown Victoria or Lincoln Town Car?
Want a new Ford or new Lincoln?
Get Justice